|
Closed Loop Analysis Applied Closed-Loop Analysis is a formal business intelligence process intended to set business goals, monitor progress, assess impact or effectiveness and then realign objectives. It becomes a real-time process when data is collected and evaluated continuously. Closed-Loop Analysis (CLA) is not a new concept. It is the natural evolution of more traditional analytical strategic planning processes that operate on a much longer cycle. Planning cycles of a year or more were once the norm. In the case of a new marketing program, months might be dedicated to research, formulation of goals, and program design. The program is then implemented and allowed to run for 6 months to a year. While the program is running, data is gathered and compared to expected results, generally on a monthly basis. At the end of the period, the program managers evaluate the results and a decision is made: Does the program continue as is, is it tweaked, wholly revamped, or abandoned? CLA progresses from investigation to execution to evaluation and then revision in cycles as short as a quarter or even a month. The change is more than a compression of the same activities into a shorter unit of time. While the sequence stays the same, the discrete activities are fundamentally different. One defining factor is that many components of the process are automated from data collection to evaluation. At the same time, the process is more hands-on, more dynamic, and more iterative. It is more like piloting an airplane (multitudes of automated assistance with tactile immediate action) than being a passenger on an ocean liner (where you have no control and all actions have an agonizingly delayed response). With Closed-Loop Analysis, you are in control and the results of your actions have immediate consequences. Let's explore an example: A fictitious company called Acme developed a web applet that tracks useful Internet activity like logging into registered sites and submitting forms. Most clickstream data is acquired for a single site or a collection of sites that share information. The data captured by Acme covers tens of thousands of popular sites. Acme's information is more focused and more valuable than the aimless wandering-in-the-wilderness nature of raw clickstream data. For instance, are web surfers who visit multiple book-selling sites more likely to buy online than single-site browsers? Do consumers who buy stocks online sign up with the financial account aggregators more than the average click-thru visitor? What are the top ten sites visited by frequent users of any given specific site? Acme's business model is to exploit this data to create precisely targeted market opportunities for their corporate partners. One service is to help their clients know definitively which sites provide a greater click-through potential. This provides a more accurate and convincing defensive for advertising rates. Acmes shares a percentage of the generated revenue. So how does Acme start with a massive, growing repository of event data and end up with a profitable marketing business? There are two possible starting points in the CLA process for Acme. On the one hand, they could forge an agreement with the owners of key web sites they already have in their tracking inventory and then ferret out correlated behaviors for them. On the other hand, they could first identify strong associations in the data and then sell to sites that have the most impressive correlated behavior. In either case, these opportunities form a premise that is the first step in a closed-loop process. The CLA phases are analogous to the steps in the PDCA process of Total Quality Management. PDCA means Plan, Do, Check, Act. Plan involves setting objectives and designing a program or process. Do means to execute the process; while Check is a milestone step using a predefined evaluation framework to monitor and test the success of your efforts. Act is a dynamic process of course-correction that loops back to the Plan step. You take what you learned and plow it back into the next PDCA cycle. Closed-Loop Analysis starts with a premise as in our example. The investigate phase entails the most sophisticated analysis. You search for correlations and associations that represent discernable patterns in the data. You may use clustering or segmentation techniques to find sets of common factors or behaviors. You may set out to validate or reject a hypothesis. In all cases, the result is a proposed course of action such as a marketing program or an additional web site feature or even a new product. The next step is to establish the evaluation framework and monitoring mechanism. We call this the initiation phase. A critical facet of CLA is that measurable success criteria are defined up front. The measurement mechanism may be as basic as periodic reporting, a more sophisticated method such as dynamic alerts, or some form of continuous tracking against a baseline target. With the evaluation framework in place, you are ready to begin the execution phase. Unlike the sequential nature of the PDCA process, monitoring takes place throughout the execution phase; doing and checking as you go. Instead of monthly checkpoints, we are more likely to monitor progress on a weekly, daily, or continuous basis. The evaluation framework should define thresholds. Thresholds can be volumes or rates or both. Examples include a sales volume target or an adoption rate or a percentage of click-thrus that generate sales. You generally define an "unqualified success" level, a "just getting by" or "marginal" target, and an "unacceptable attainment" or "oops" threshold. Thresholds can be a single number by a specified point in time but are more effective if the are a trended projection over time. With thresholds defined, the monitoring process has an ongoing evaluation component. Generally, you time-box the execution phase but can pull the plug at anytime. Time-boxing means you set an outside limit on how long the program runs before you force an evaluation milestone. At an evaluation milestone, you decide to expand, continue, revise, re-plan, or terminate. If you hit the "unqualified success" threshold, you might continue a successful program or expand the process (e.g. more clients or more products or more similar programs). If you only attain a "marginal" performance level, you may need to either revise or re-plan. To revise involves minor corrections to the execution strategy and may require additional investigation. A re-plan involves substantial new investigative analysis and potentially a modification to the original defining premise. Tracking at or below the "oops" threshold may require you to terminate the program early. If the results are disastrous, you have to determine if the execution was fundamentally flawed. If it was, you must consider the value and feasibility of staging a new trial or redesigning your execution process. If it was not flawed, you may be forced to reject the whole premise and start from scratch. In summary, the CLA steps are: (1) Propose a Premise, (2) Investigate the Data, (3) Design a Program, (4) Establish an Evaluation Framework, (5) Develop the Monitoring Mechanism, (6) Execute the Program, (7) Monitor Progress, (8) Evaluate Success, (9) Act on Results, (10) Do it Again (Recycle). Let's walk through the steps using our Acme example:
A closing comment: This article highlights an Internet-style company because it demonstrates CLA in a fast-paced and information-rich mode. These techniques are being applied to supply chain management, product positioning, portfolio management, niche market development in several industries, and many more situations. There is likely an opportunity to exploit Closed-Loop Analysis where you work. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
home | about us | solutions | products | partners | clients | careers | contact us | search |
|||